Interestingly Kalindu forwarded me this article only months after I penned a very similar one, albeit slightly more scathing. I decided not to publish my article but my sentiments towards the minimal watch trend are (gingerly) expressed in the article below. There is nothing exciting, innovative or admirable about any brand from this category, apart from Filip Tysander’s success peddling junk – fair play to him. Every day we receive emails about a new ‘affordable, minimal’ watch brand launching on Kickstarter and every day we delete the emails. It’s a saturated market of unoriginal trash where the products cost less per unit to make than the green juice your favourite Instagram ‘entrepreuner’ is promoting alongside it. People will say that’s my opinion – it’s also a fact.
It can be aptly described using the following adjectives: clean, elegant, sleek and above all simplistic. What I’m talking about is this latest trend in watches, which encapsulates a NATO or leather strap but importantly a clean and straightforward face with the barest of essentials. Brilliantly honing the preparatory, Ivy-league panache, anyone who wears this style watch can be subconsciously categorised into the “my dad’s a lawyer, so you can’t touch me” look. Unless you’re the Starfish from Nickelodeon’s greatest cartoon, SpongeBob Square Pants and have been living under a rock for the past two years, you’ll be well aware that I’m trying to describe the the minimal watch style favoured by today’s millennial.
Sounds brilliant? Yes? No, no it’s not; because the trend is dead, sorry but that’s the cold hard truth.
It’s become the man-bun of watch styles; many wanted this look, but once every Tom, Dick and Harry started donning a man-bun the trend died. I don’t believe the watch died due to an augmentation in popularity rather I hypothesised that it died due to the amount of start-ups that have flooded the market with this style of watch. Yet why not, from a business perspective, the watch style is a cheap make and attractive – easy money, all one had to do was create an Instagram account, accumulate followers, take a few pictures and bang, you’ve got profit (well, not really but you get the drift). I need to emphasise the role of social media in this as well, namely Instagram as this is the primary form of advertising for the start up watch companies. Ironically, go back a few years and advertising on Instagram or social media platforms would have seemed like a ludicrous idea as it broke the traditional forms of advertising. Anyone could do it, broad global reach and most appealingly, it was free. Today virtually every company has a social media account, some going as far as dedicating employees solely to it.
Pioneering this vehicle of advertising was Filip Tysander, a Swedish gentlemen, whose inability to purchase a Rolex inspired him to invent a watch company of his own. Tysander opted for a business plan, which placed Instagram at the forefront. Secondly, he departed from the watch trend of the time, which was chunky, crammed and digital to embracing the style that is the motif of this article: clean and simple. Moreover, the watch was relatively cheap, retailing for approximately $350 AUD. This combination made it not only a desirable on the global market, but it was a desire that could be achieved by many.
Novel at the time, Daniel Wellington is now valued at a staggering $180 million dollars, which is analogous to industry stalwarts such as Tag Heuer. As I stated earlier, the relative ease of the business plan and the
not so hefty diminutive cost prices made it desirable to other entrepreneurs looking to set their mark on the market, and when other companies did model their businesses on Tysander’s original plan, the trend was inadvertently placed on a time bomb. It was just a matter of time before the market was flooded with numerous watch companies tendering similar if not near identical products with different price ranges. This, as I argue, severely diminished the quality and the refreshing factor of the style. This is compounded by the fact that some watches are essentially a copy of Daniel Wellington’s original design with the sole difference being the logo.
For instance, Elmore Lewis draws remarkably similar design comparisons to Daniel Wellington from the watch face to the watchstraps. Moreover, watch brands Kapten and Sons, the Horse, the Fifth and countless other brands are in a similar boat with the analogous designs. The point is as I’ve reiterated throughout, the market has been flooded with extremely similar products to the degree that I believe the style has lost its flare and the refreshing attraction it once possessed.